data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/719bb/719bb10ff26ee8bd3059a47eb8fdd2d827e85633" alt="City of Liverpool College announces new partnership with global leader in games education"
Education
Parents could soon face tougher penalties for school absences
12 months ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3020b/3020b5c72d1b7cafd65f25d1737344fe2551e545" alt="Parents could soon face tougher penalties for school absences"
A financial penalty must be considered if a child misses five days of school for unauthorised absence, the Government has said.
Parents in England who take their children out of class without permission will face higher fines as part of a drive to boost school attendance following the pandemic.
The Department for Education (DfE) has said a fine must be considered if a child misses five days of school for unauthorised absence.
School absence fines currently start at ÂŁ60, rising to ÂŁ120 if they are not paid within 21 days. But the DfE has said fines will now start at ÂŁ80, rising to ÂŁ160.
It comes after nearly 400,000 penalty notices were issued to parents in England in 2022-23 for unauthorised school absences â which was much higher than pre-pandemic levels.
Nearly nine in ten (89.3%) of the fines were for unauthorised holidays as families looked to book cheaper vacations outside school term times, according to DfE figures released in December.
Government guidance is expected to clarify when financial penalties for school absences should be used to ensure councils issue fines appropriately.
The DfE has said school absence fines will be brought under a national framework to help tackle inconsistencies in their use across England.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b40c2/b40c2e9fccfc39101671ec47235af4ec182af01b" alt="Empty Classroom image."
Under the new measures â which have been announced as part of the Governmentâs efforts to try to cut down on the number of children who are regularly missing school â every state school in England will share their daily attendance registers with the DfE, councils and academy trusts.
It is understood the higher fines for absences will come into effect from September.
The DfE hopes the data set will help schools spot and support children at risk of persistent absence, or in danger of becoming missing from education.
Rob Tarn, chief executive of Northern Education Trust and founder of Englandâs first attendance hub, has also been appointed by the DfE as the new national attendance ambassador.
Guidance â setting out how schools and local authorities must take a âsupport-firstâ approach to help pupils and their families to tackle barriers to attendance â will be made statutory from August, the DfE has said.
Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said:
âOur fantastic schools and teachers unlock childrenâs imagination, potential and social skills which is why improving attendance is my number one priority.
âToday we are taking that next step to further boost attendance and I want to thank those who are working with us including teachers and heads.
âEducation standards have risen sharply across the country, with Ofsted ratings up from 68% to nearly 90% since 2010 â and pupilsâ performance is ranked as some of the best globally â so it has never been more valuable to be in school.â
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leadersâ union NAHT, said:
âA consistent national framework for fines makes sense. Currently there is significant variation between how and when local authorities issue fines to parents.
âHowever, parents will likely be surprised that at a time when schools are struggling to find enough teachers to teach classes, when buildings are crumbling, and when we are in the middle of a crisis in special needs provision, that the Government is choosing to focus on increasing fines for parents.
âGood attendance is obviously critically important, but fines have long proven to be too blunt a tool and largely ineffective at improving persistent absence.â
He added: âWhat is really needed to tackle poor attendance is more targeted resources to find out the reasons behind absence, including support for vulnerable families and for children and young peopleâs mental health.
âWithout that work, higher fines could just be further punishing already struggling families and children.â
Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said:
âIt is not unreasonable to increase the level of fines for unauthorised absence given that they have been fixed at ÂŁ60 for several years.
âHowever, it is important to understand that these fines predominately relate to pupils who are taken out of school for term-time holidays. While nobody wants to be in a position of fining parents there simply has to be a marker that this is not acceptable.
âNot only does it affect the childâs education but it means teachers then have to spend time helping children to catch-up with lost learning. If everybody did this it would be chaos.â
Labourâs shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson said:
âThe Conservatives are only just waking up to the damage of persistent absence that has reached historic levels on their watch, but their answer addresses the symptoms of absence, not the causes.
âPersistent absence was rising long before the pandemic â the result of growing unaddressed mental ill health and the impact of years of economic decline hitting family finances and a breakdown of trust between schools and families.
âThe Tories should follow Labourâs plan to tackle absence, introduce a register of children not in school, bringing together childrenâs existing records and investing in access to mental health counselling support in every school to deal with persistent absence once and for all.â