Music
Ticketmaster under investigation over Oasis ticket sales
4 months ago
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched an investigation into Ticketmaster over its sale of Oasis concert tickets, examining whether the companyâs practices may have breached consumer protection laws.
The investigation comes after widespread complaints from Oasis fans regarding unexpectedly high prices and a lack of transparency about the use of dynamic pricing.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said its investigation would include how so-called âdynamic pricingâ may have been used and would scrutinise whether the sale of Oasis tickets by Ticketmaster may have breached consumer protection law.
Ticketmaster has said it does not set concert prices and its website states this is down to the âevent organiserâ who âhas priced these tickets according to their market valueâ.
The investigation would consider whether Ticketmaster had engaged in unfair commercial practices, if people were given clear and timely information to explain that the tickets could be subject to so-called âdynamic pricingâ, and if consumers were put under pressure to buy tickets within a short period of time â at a higher price than they understood they would have to pay.
The CMA said it would now engage with Ticketmaster and gather evidence from various other sources, which may include the bandâs management and event organisers.
The CMA is also inviting fans to submit evidence of their experiences in relation to the purchase or attempted purchase of Oasis tickets.
It has asked fans to provide their evidence on the CMAâs website and, where possible, to include any screenshots they may have taken as they progressed through the buying process.
The CMA said it should not be assumed that Ticketmaster had broken consumer protection law.
CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell said: âItâs important that fans are treated fairly when they buy tickets, which is why weâve launched this investigation.
âItâs clear that many people felt they had a bad experience and were surprised by the price of their tickets at check-out.
âWe want to hear from fans who went through the process and may have encountered issues so that we can investigate whether existing consumer protection law has been breached.
âThe CMA also welcomes the governmentâs recent announcement that it will consult on measures to provide stronger protections to consumers in the ticketing sector, wherever they buy their tickets.
âThis has been a priority focus for the CMA for several years, having previously taken enforcement action and recommended changes to improve the secondary tickets market. We are committed to working closely with government to tackle the longstanding challenges in the ticket market.â
Earlier on Thursday, the CMA said it was âworking at paceâ to establish the facts around the Oasis tickets sale and keeping open the option of enforcement action for any breaches of consumer protection laws.
The authority said it was âaware of widespread concernsâ regarding the sale of Oasis tickets by Ticketmaster, âand possibly other primary ticket sellersâ, on August 31.
While it said dynamic pricing, which saw standard tickets for the reunion tour more than doubling from ÂŁ148 to ÂŁ355 on Ticketmaster, was ânot in itself unlawfulâ, it said businesses âmust not mislead customers about their prices, and must be transparent about how prices are setâ.
In a letter to Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, CMA bosses wrote: âWith this in mind, we are working at pace to establish the precise factual background to the sale of Oasis tickets on August 31, and we are keeping open all potential options for action.
âThis includes potential enforcement action where we see evidence of possible breaches of consumer protection law.
âWe will update you on any next steps in the coming weeks.â
The letter comes days after many fans were shocked by standard tickets for the bandâs reunion tour more than doubling, prompting the Government and the CMA to pledge they will look into the use of dynamic pricing.
Meanwhile, others were left angry and disappointed after being left empty-handed, having waited in an online queue for hours to buy tickets.
On Wednesday, Oasis announced new Wembley Stadium dates using a new ticketing plan following the chaos over the weekend.
Liam and Noel Gallagher have extended their Live â25 tour to include two more London shows on September 27 and 28 2025, using a new âstaggered invitation-only ballot processâ with applications to join the ballot opened first to those who were unsuccessful in the initial sale.
A statement said: âIt needs to be made clear that Oasis leave decisions on ticketing and pricing entirely to their promoters and management, and at no time had any awareness that dynamic pricing was going to be used.
âWhile prior meetings between promoters, Ticketmaster and the bandâs management resulted in a positive ticket sale strategy, which would be a fair experience for fans, including dynamic ticketing to help keep general ticket prices down as well as reduce touting, the execution of the plan failed to meet expectations.
âAll parties involved did their utmost to deliver the best possible fan experience but due to the unprecedented demand this became impossible to achieve.â
Ticketmaster has said it does not set concert prices and its website states this is down to the âevent organiserâ who âhas priced these tickets according to their market valueâ.
The long-awaited Oasis reunion tour has attracted huge attention from fans because it will see the Manchester-formed Britpop band on stage together for the first time since their split in 2009.
On August 31, they revealed the general sale tickets for their UK and Ireland gigs had sold out in less than a day but many fans missed out as they battled website issues and being mislabelled as bots.
Following the ticket furore, the Advertising Standards Authority received 450 complaints about Ticketmaster adverts for the Oasis gigs.
A spokesman for the UKâs regulator of advertising said the complainants argue that the adverts made âmisleading claims about availability and pricingâ.